{{NEWPAGE}}
/********************** DON'T EDIT ABOVE THIS LINE **********************/



= MICADO portal at OmegaCEN

== Status

* preparing for ESO contract to start phase B (KO-PDR): living [[https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0Ah9tUSrro9zCdEw5TGFMX1VwTDFhOUhpQy1JVWxRQmc&usp=sharing | MICADO spreadsheet]] for latest status. 
* FInished ADC study #2, see [[projects:micado:astrom|Astrometry with MICADO]]

== Useful documents and links

* See [[projects:micado:documentation|Documentation for MICADO Data Flow]]
* http://www.bo.astro.it/~maory/Maory/Welcome.html

== Contacts

^Person^email^tel^
|MICADO project office | micado-office@mpe.mpg.de | |


== Handy links / references

[[http://astroweb1.physics.ox.ac.uk/instr/HARMONI/ | Harmoni]] 

== Scratch notes

 
Read GeMS first on-sky results (Rigaut+ SPIE 2012) in more detail:
-appears very relevant benchmark (MCAO, 8.1meter telescope, LGS) for MICADO + MAORY 39m E-ELT. Only reality-case I now know off.
-astrometric pipeline in paper simplistic. Yet no indication of hitting intra-night dynamic systematics for relative astrometry downto at least ~400microarcsec.
Not covered in paper:
-inter-night/epoch dynamic systematics
-static systematics: is MICADO calibration mask sufficient to monitor this? On-sky near polar field also needed? 
I have emailed Rodrigo Carrasco ( a GeMS instrument scientist) to get to their experience on these. No response yet.
-to do: determine if MAD is another benchmark.

* Prezi at: http://prezi.com/2ucz56uxyfjc/edit/#36