MICADO portal at OmegaCEN

• Working on ADC study #2, see Astrometry with MICADO

See Documentation for MICADO Data Flow

• Sgr A* proper motions with NACO, Schoedel et al 2009
• Matthias Schoeck Developing Performance Estimates for High Precision Astrometry with TMT
• 11:40 Brent Ellerbroek Evaluation of Astrometry Errors due to the Optical Surface Distortions in Adaptive Optics Systems and Science Instruments
• 12:20 S. Mark Ammons On-Sky Pathfinder Tests of Calibrated MCAO Astrometry and Implications for MCAO on ELTs
• 17:00 Sylvana Yelda Astrometry in the Galactic center with TMT
• Deep et al. 2011

• GeMS pages
• ESO messenger 148, June 2012 article on 39m E-ELT design, also containing links to various other documents.
• http://www.mpe.mpg.de/ir/instruments/micado/micado.php?lang=de
• E-ELT construction proposal
• micado_0024_datareduction_v1.0.pdf
• http://ao4elt3.sciencesconf.org/ AO for ELTs conference 2013, Firenze

Read GeMS first on-sky results (Rigaut+ SPIE 2012) in more detail:
-appears very relevant benchmark (MCAO, 8.1meter telescope, LGS) for MICADO + MAORY 39m E-ELT. Only reality-case I now know off.
-astrometric pipeline in paper simplistic. Yet no indication of hitting intra-night dynamic systematics for relative astrometry downto at least ~400microarcsec.
Not covered in paper:
-inter-night/epoch dynamic systematics
-static systematics: is MICADO calibration mask sufficient to monitor this? On-sky near polar field also needed?
I have emailed Rodrigo Carrasco ( a GeMS instrument scientist) to get to their experience on these. No response yet.
-to do: determine if MAD is another benchmark.

• Prezi at: http://prezi.com/2ucz56uxyfjc/edit/#36